Using Competitions & RFPs Requests for Proposals
When does it make sense to hold a grant competition or use an RFP? In addition to looking at management issues to consider along the way, this guide explores how grantmakers shape competitions to serve larger strategic goals, communicate with wider audiences, create a learning community, and find ways to work with those who are not selected.
Highlights
- Deciding whether to use an RFP
- Shaping the competition so it serves your goals
- Managing the process and other issues to consider
What's in the Guide?
There are many ways to communicate about grantmaking goals, to solicit proposals, and to ensure that grants are awarded fairly. Holding a competition, with a written solicitation of proposalsand a formal process for selecting grantees isn't the only way to achieve these things, but it can be a highly effective one.
- When does it make sense to hold a grant competition or use an RFP? Competitions are sometimes the best way to organize a program and select grantees — but not always. They're useful, for example, if you're entering a big and unfamiliar field, or trying to enlarge your circle of grantees, or concerned about making decisions in an especially transparent and evenhanded way. Here, grant makers reflect on the circumstances that made competitions a good choice for what they wanted to achieve.
- How can you make the component parts of an RFP process or competition serve your program goals? If it's set up wisely, the very act of holding a competition can contribute to the field you're working in. The contents of your RFP, your selection criteria, the things you ask applicants to consider proposing — all these things can send a message to the field and elevate issues you consider important. The process by which you solicit grants and interact with applicants can be a learning experience for you and them. Several grant makers offer experiences with competitions that show how this can work.
- Management and administrative issues to consider. If you take on a competition, be sure you're ready for the administrative and procedural workload. To be effective, a competition takes careful planning and execution, and it poses a number of out-of-the-ordinary administrative responsibilities. It's sometimes useful to enlist an outside organization to manage part or all of the process. In this section, grant makers reflect on what it takes to set up and administer an effective competition.
- Working with advisers. Outside experts, working individually or as a panel, can help guide you through the planning of your competition, the scoring and selection of applications, and the implementation of the proposals that are selected. It helps, though, to be clear about exactly how you would like these advisers to work, in what roles, at what stage. Here, grantmakers describe how they used advisers to get better results.
- Using the competition or RFP process to create a learning community. Holding a competition can help in forming a "learning community" in your field. Sometimes, people working in a field gain insights or focus their discussions as a direct result of a grant competition. Soliciting a number of proposals that are organized to address the same set of issues, and then convening those who apply (or those who are selected) for ongoing discussions can advance that process. Grantmakers reflect on how that has worked in different cases.
- Ways to work with those who are not selected. It helps to have a plan for how you'll deal with the applicants you don't select for funding. At a minimum, grantmakers feel it's important to give them early notice that they weren't selected, and to try to explain how the decision was made. But in addition, some grantmakers try to do more for the unsuccessful applicants. Here, they offer thoughts on how to make competitions useful even for those who don't win.
- Communicating with wider audiences about the competition. When you first start planning a competition, it's not too soon to begin thinking about ways to tell a wider audience about the competition's purposes, progress, and results. Sometimes, the ideas in an RFP, or just the fact that an RFP has been issued, constitute important information that might interest a broader public. In this section, grantmakers describe how they approached communication as part of organizing a competition.
Categories
Content type
-
Link to Calculating Your Organization’s Digital Dependence
Lessons from Grantmakers on Using Competitions and RFPs
As you think about whether a competition or an RFP would be helpful to your program, it might be useful to bear in mind these brief lessons that our contributors have identified:
Read more -
Link to Calculating Your Organization’s Digital Dependence
Advantages of Internal Management
Hands-on experience for the grantmaker: If the competition addresses a field that is new to the grantmaker or represents a new direction for an existing grant program, the grantmaker may decide to manage a competition internally so that he or she can learn more from the process and develop a more direct relationship with the field.
Read more - Link to Calculating Your Organization’s Digital Dependence
-
Link to Calculating Your Organization’s Digital Dependence
What Grantees Wish Grantmakers Knew about RFPs
- Get feedback from the community before you launch an RFP or competition — don’t create your plan in a vacuum.
- Be clear up front about what you are looking for, and make the application simple.
-
Link to Calculating Your Organization’s Digital Dependence
Utilizing Grantees for RFP/Competition Communications
Require a communication plan from every competition winner. These plans may include print or electronic materials, conferences, and seminars for others working in the field. Some grantmakers provide grantees with the services of communications experts to help formulate or carry out their communications plans.
Read more -
Link to Calculating Your Organization’s Digital Dependence
Technical Assistance for Everybody
When grantmakers make technical assistance or information available to grantees in the competition, they can also provide it to organizations not selected for grants.
Read more -
Link to Calculating Your Organization’s Digital Dependence
Sharing Negative Outcome News
In some cases it makes sense to set funds aside for smaller awards to runners-up, especially if the invitation pool is large and it is unclear how many will actually apply.
Read more -
Link to Calculating Your Organization’s Digital Dependence
RFP as Learning Tool
Make the RFP a tool to identify shared learning objectives among the grantee cohort. Ask potential applicants: What would you like to learn? What can we help you find out? Their responses may give you some ideas about what those closest to the field think are the important issues to explore.
Read more -
Link to Calculating Your Organization’s Digital Dependence
Working with Advisors
Be clear about advisers’ and grantmakers’ roles: When grants will be made directly by the funder, the grantmaker needs to strike a balance between the autonomy of the advisory committee and the ultimate responsibility of the funder for the decisions that are made.
Read more -
Link to Calculating Your Organization’s Digital Dependence
Planning a Competition: Time
When planning a competition, it makes sense to think about whether it will be a unique event or whether there will be multiple cycles, and how the competition might change over time. The kind of questions that grantmakers need to consider include:
Read more
When does it make sense to hold a grant competition or use an RFP? In addition to looking at management issues to consider along the way, this guide explores how grantmakers shape competitions to serve larger strategic goals, communicate with wider audiences, create a learning community, and find ways to work with those who are not selected.
Highlights
- Deciding whether to use an RFP
- Shaping the competition so it serves your goals
- Managing the process and other issues to consider
What's in the Guide?
There are many ways to communicate about grantmaking goals, to solicit proposals, and to ensure that grants are awarded fairly. Holding a competition, with a written solicitation of proposalsand a formal process for selecting grantees isn't the only way to achieve these things, but it can be a highly effective one.
- When does it make sense to hold a grant competition or use an RFP? Competitions are sometimes the best way to organize a program and select grantees — but not always. They're useful, for example, if you're entering a big and unfamiliar field, or trying to enlarge your circle of grantees, or concerned about making decisions in an especially transparent and evenhanded way. Here, grant makers reflect on the circumstances that made competitions a good choice for what they wanted to achieve.
- How can you make the component parts of an RFP process or competition serve your program goals? If it's set up wisely, the very act of holding a competition can contribute to the field you're working in. The contents of your RFP, your selection criteria, the things you ask applicants to consider proposing — all these things can send a message to the field and elevate issues you consider important. The process by which you solicit grants and interact with applicants can be a learning experience for you and them. Several grant makers offer experiences with competitions that show how this can work.
- Management and administrative issues to consider. If you take on a competition, be sure you're ready for the administrative and procedural workload. To be effective, a competition takes careful planning and execution, and it poses a number of out-of-the-ordinary administrative responsibilities. It's sometimes useful to enlist an outside organization to manage part or all of the process. In this section, grant makers reflect on what it takes to set up and administer an effective competition.
- Working with advisers. Outside experts, working individually or as a panel, can help guide you through the planning of your competition, the scoring and selection of applications, and the implementation of the proposals that are selected. It helps, though, to be clear about exactly how you would like these advisers to work, in what roles, at what stage. Here, grantmakers describe how they used advisers to get better results.
- Using the competition or RFP process to create a learning community. Holding a competition can help in forming a "learning community" in your field. Sometimes, people working in a field gain insights or focus their discussions as a direct result of a grant competition. Soliciting a number of proposals that are organized to address the same set of issues, and then convening those who apply (or those who are selected) for ongoing discussions can advance that process. Grantmakers reflect on how that has worked in different cases.
- Ways to work with those who are not selected. It helps to have a plan for how you'll deal with the applicants you don't select for funding. At a minimum, grantmakers feel it's important to give them early notice that they weren't selected, and to try to explain how the decision was made. But in addition, some grantmakers try to do more for the unsuccessful applicants. Here, they offer thoughts on how to make competitions useful even for those who don't win.
- Communicating with wider audiences about the competition. When you first start planning a competition, it's not too soon to begin thinking about ways to tell a wider audience about the competition's purposes, progress, and results. Sometimes, the ideas in an RFP, or just the fact that an RFP has been issued, constitute important information that might interest a broader public. In this section, grantmakers describe how they approached communication as part of organizing a competition.